Dear Watsonville
This looks really good. The art style is lovely. More stills available here.
This looks really good. The art style is lovely. More stills available here.
Looking at my Letterboxd average review scores and it seems like I have a four-star wall:
This isn’t as prominent as some I’ve seen. But it did get me thinking about why this is. Most importantly– I don’t like watching bad movies. To borrow words from a famous food critic, if I know I won’t like a movie, “I don’t swallow.” That reasonably skews my movie selection in the direction of things I’ll rate higher (i.e. above three-ish stars). I also have very limited time as a dad, so I need to choose wisely.
That being said, I tend to root for movies. Even when they’re uneven, I will rate them well if I enjoyed myself. Two and two-and-a-half feel reserved for movies I genuinely didn’t enjoy, but were still watchable, in a sort of “this sure is a movie” sense. Anything below that is borderline unwatchable. Most movies I watch are “meh” or better, so three and up it is.
(On the other side of the wall, four and half is reserved for movies I think are great and some of my favorites. A full five indicates a movie I struggle to find fault with. Obviously pretty rare.)
Was talking with a friend about The Grand Budapest Hotel and came up with what I call the WATI (Wes Anderson Tolerance Index).
Weights your ratings of his films/shorts/ads based on runtime and averages the scores out. I have a relatively high WATI of 0.83.
Feel free to make a copy the Google Sheet and track your own WATI here.
Criterion added a slew of films to its streaming site for Sony Pictures Classics’ 30th anniversary. There are a few in here I’ve seen but a lot more I’ve been waiting to see. On my watchlist:
If I get around to watching them (which is tough as a new parent working full-time and going into the holidays), I’ll be logging them on my Letterboxd account. (I wonder if there’s a Letterboxd → Micro.blog crossposting tool?)